GHR Healthcare Quick Apply Search Jobs Log In
school-therapist-shortage.webp

School Therapy Staffing: Meeting Demand for OTs, PTs, and SLPs

August 13, 2026

When a student’s IEP includes occupational therapy, physical therapy, or speech-language services, the district remains responsible for providing them. A vacancy does not eliminate that responsibility.

For many districts, maintaining coverage is increasingly difficult. Occupational therapists, physical therapists, and speech-language pathologists can pursue opportunities across schools, hospitals, outpatient clinics, rehabilitation centers, private practices, home health, early intervention, and teletherapy. Districts must compete for qualified professionals while managing caseloads, evaluations, documentation, IEP meetings, and service coordination.

This article examines the factors that can increase school therapy workload, why recruitment can be challenging, how staffing gaps may affect districts and students, and what schools can do to strengthen coverage.

Why OTs, PTs, and SLPs Are Essential in Schools

Occupational therapists, physical therapists, and speech-language pathologists support students’ access to instruction and participation in school routines. Their responsibilities may include direct therapy, evaluation, consultation, assistive technology support, classroom strategies, family communication, and collaboration with educators and other specialists.

Several factors can increase the workload associated with school-based therapy, including:

Earlier Identification and Longer Service Periods

Improved screening, referral, and evaluation processes can identify students earlier in their educational careers. Earlier identification may give students access to support sooner, but it can also mean that districts serve those students across more years of school.

The effect on staffing depends on the number of students identified, the services included in their IEPs, the frequency of those services, and the district’s available provider capacity.

Inclusion and Expanded Collaboration

When therapy is delivered in general education settings, therapists may work beyond scheduled sessions. They may adapt classroom materials, collaborate with teachers and paraprofessionals, support assistive technology, consult on transportation or positioning, and help teams apply strategies throughout the school day.

These activities can benefit students, but they also add responsibilities that a simple caseload count may not capture.

Workload Beyond Caseload Counts

Two therapists with the same number of students may have very different workloads. Factors such as evaluation volume, IEP meeting schedules, progress reporting, travel between buildings, student needs, and the number of campuses covered can all affect the time required.

Caseload remains an important staffing metric, but districts may also benefit from tracking the broader workload associated with each role. Staffing decisions based only on student counts may not account for all the time required to provide services and coordinate support effectively.

Why the Supply of School Therapists Falls Short

School districts compete with employers across the healthcare and education sectors for qualified OTs, PTs, and SLPs. Several factors can narrow the available candidate pool.

Therapists Have Options Across Employment Settings

The Bureau of Labor Statistics projects strong employment growth for all three disciplines from 2024 through 2034. These projections describe national employment growth across all settings. They do not establish school-specific shortages, but they do show that districts are recruiting from professions with strong overall demand.

Discipline Projected Growth, 2024–2034 Employment Settings Included
Speech-language pathologists 15%1 Schools, hospitals, outpatient clinics, private practices, and other settings
Occupational therapists 14%2 Hospitals, rehabilitation centers, schools, home health, and other settings
Physical therapists 11%3 Outpatient clinics, hospitals, schools, home health, rehabilitation, and other settings

 Source 1 | Source 2 | Source 3

Schools may compete with hospitals, outpatient clinics, rehabilitation centers, home health agencies, skilled nursing facilities, early intervention programs, private practices, teletherapy providers, and sports medicine organizations.

Compensation is one factor in a therapist’s decision. Workload, schedule flexibility, professional growth, benefits, commute, workplace culture, and the opportunity to work with a consistent student population may also influence where candidates choose to practice.

Professional Pipelines Take Time to Expand

Each discipline requires advanced education, supervised clinical experience, licensing examinations, and ongoing professional development. Those requirements take years to complete, so the workforce cannot respond immediately when demand rises.

Even when graduate programs produce more new professionals, districts may still compete with employers that offer different schedules, compensation structures, benefits, or clinical environments.

Geography and Credentialing Can Narrow the Pool

The availability of licensed therapists varies by region. Rural districts, geographically dispersed communities, and areas with smaller candidate pools may face particular challenges recruiting on-site providers.

State licensure, background checks, school credentialing, and district onboarding requirements can add time to the hiring process. For therapists relocating from another state, those steps may delay a start date unless they are planned early.

How Therapy Staffing Gaps May Affect Schools and Students

When therapy positions remain vacant, districts may need to adjust schedules, redistribute caseloads, or modify service delivery while continuing to meet students’ educational needs. The effects can vary by discipline, school, student population, and available coverage.

Remaining therapists may experience increased workload, while students may see changes in scheduling or provider continuity. Evaluation timelines and collaboration time may also become more difficult to manage when staffing capacity is limited.

Collaboration May Become More Difficult to Protect

Therapists work with teachers, administrators, families, and other specialists to develop strategies that support students throughout the school day. Much of that work does not appear as a scheduled therapy minute.

When staffing is constrained, districts may need to prioritize legally required services and time-sensitive evaluations. As a result, consultation, planning, and informal coordination may receive less protected time unless leaders build those responsibilities into workload expectations.

Continuity Can Be Harder to Maintain

Students and families may benefit from working consistently with a therapist who understands their goals, routines, and needs. Vacancies, coverage changes, and temporary assignments can make that continuity more difficult to maintain.

A stable staffing plan does not guarantee that every student will have the same provider throughout the year, but clear onboarding, documentation, and transition processes can help reduce disruption when staffing changes occur.

What SLP Workforce Data Shows

The 2024 ASHA Schools Survey found that 79% of responding school-based SLPs described their local job market as having more openings than job seekers. Respondents also identified workload, paperwork, meetings, staffing shortages, and burnout among common professional concerns.

These findings reflect the experiences of responding school-based SLPs and should not be treated as a direct measure of the OT or PT labor markets. They do, however, illustrate the workload and recruitment pressures that school-based therapy teams may need to manage.

Recruiting and Retaining School Therapists

Districts can strengthen coverage by treating recruitment and retention as ongoing workforce planning rather than activities that begin only after a vacancy opens.

Forecast Needs Before Vacancies Open

Review enrollment, anticipated IEP service needs, retirements, resignations, leaves of absence, extended school year programs, and known program changes. Early planning gives districts more time to build candidate pipelines and begin outreach before peak hiring periods.

Vacancies that open during the school year may be more challenging to fill because many qualified candidates have already accepted positions elsewhere.

Define the Role Precisely

School therapy roles can vary significantly between districts. Job descriptions should clearly explain caseload expectations, evaluation responsibilities, building assignments, travel requirements, documentation expectations, IEP meeting participation, planning and collaboration time, supervision, team structure, and available equipment and support.

Clear expectations can improve candidate alignment and reduce the risk of mismatched expectations after hiring.

Expand Recruitment Channels

A single job board may not reach enough qualified candidates. Districts can expand recruitment through university partnerships, professional associations, alumni networks, clinical education programs, employee referrals, graduate program outreach, and specialized education staffing firms.

Communicate the Value of School-Based Practice

Some therapists choose schools because they want to support a student’s development over time and collaborate closely with educators and families. A school calendar, consistent student population, interdisciplinary teamwork, and the opportunity to connect therapy to classroom participation may also appeal to candidates.

Districts should describe those benefits accurately while also providing a realistic picture of the role. Candidates entering a new district may find these tips for starting a school therapist role useful.

Move Quickly and Support the Hire

Long delays between application, interview, offer, credentialing, and onboarding can make it more difficult to secure qualified candidates. After hiring, retention may improve when therapists receive meaningful onboarding, protected collaboration time, relevant professional development, and reliable access to the systems and equipment their roles require.

Flexible Staffing Options When Recruitment Falls Short

Even strong recruitment and retention efforts may not fill every vacancy. Contract staffing and teletherapy can give districts additional flexibility while permanent hiring continues. Neither replaces long-term workforce planning, but both may help address specific coverage needs.

Contract Staffing

A specialized education staffing partner can expand a district’s candidate pool beyond the local market and support full-year, short-term, part-time, or leave coverage.

When evaluating a contract staffing partner, look for experience placing school-based OTs, PTs, and SLPs, knowledge of state licensure and school credentialing, candidate screening and qualification verification, support with credentialing and onboarding, understanding of IEP-driven services and school calendars, and capacity for different assignment lengths and schedules.

GHR Education provides school therapy staffing services for occupational therapists, physical therapists, and speech-language pathologists.

Teletherapy

Teletherapy can connect students with licensed professionals outside the immediate geographic area. It is most commonly used for speech-language pathology and selected therapy or consultation services.

Suitability depends on the student’s needs, IEP team decisions, state requirements, technology access, privacy considerations, on-site support, and the district’s service delivery model. Some districts use hybrid arrangements in which remote therapists work with on-site staff or facilitators. Districts should evaluate teletherapy as one possible service-delivery option rather than assuming it is appropriate for every student or therapy goal.

What to Look for in a School Therapy Staffing Partner

When internal recruitment cannot fully meet staffing needs, the right partner can become part of the district’s workforce strategy. Evaluate staffing partners on:

  •  Experience placing school-based OTs, PTs, and SLPs
  •  Knowledge of state licensure, school credentialing, and compliance
  • Candidate screening and qualification verification
  • Recruitment reach across multiple geographic markets
  • Support throughout credentialing and onboarding
  • Clear communication during the hiring process
  • Capacity for full-time, part-time, leave, and short-term assignments
  • Understanding of IEP-driven services, school calendars, and educational environments

A staffing partner should understand a district’s goals before recommending an approach. Staffing needs may vary based on enrollment, student populations, service models, geographic distribution, and internal resources.

Strengthen Therapy Coverage and Student Support

Proactive planning, clear role expectations, and flexible staffing options can help districts maintain more consistent therapy coverage. Connect with GHR Education to build a school therapy team that supports your students, staff, and service goals.

Learn more about GHR Education’s Therapy and Related Services.

Related reading on school-based roles: